GM crops increasingly common in the U.S.
by Kristi Wiedemann
Despite worldwide controversy
over the risks associated with genetically modified (GM) foods, the United
States continues to be by far the world’s largest producer. While the federal
government shows no signs of slowing this trend any time soon, U.S.
citizens have begun taking matters into their own hands with some success,
particularly in the past year. Unable to justify the risks to health and
the environment, not to mention political and economic ramifications to
farmers, citizens have now passed moratoriums on GM crops in three U.S.
counties, one town and counting. While this is certainly encouraging news,
the struggle is far from over.
U.S. Leads the Pack
Since GM crops were first introduced for commercial production in 1996,
worldwide acreage has increased 40-fold, from about 4 million acres in six
countries to 167 million in 18. The United States has consistently planted
more acreage than any other country, accounting for nearly two-thirds of
all GM crop acreage in 2003, with 106 million acres. To put this in
perspective, Argentina was the next largest producer with 34 million
acres, followed by Canada, Brazil, China and South Africa. Together, these
six countries accounted for 99 percent of GM crops grown globally last
year.
In addition to land used for GM commercial crops, an estimated
half-million acres are being used for testing purposes of about 100 other
GM species. Such experimental field trials have taken place since 1987 and
consist of plants not approved for human consumption. Some worry that
pollen drift from these crops could be even more detrimental to non-GM
crops than from those that are approved.
Most Common GM Foods
The most prevalent GM crops grown in the U.S. today are corn, cotton
and soybeans. For all but corn, the majority of each of these crops grown
in 2004 in the U.S. was genetically modified: 37 percent of corn, 76
percent of cotton and 85 percent of soy. Other commercially approved
varieties grown include canola, papaya, zucchini, tomatoes,
radicchio/chicory, flax, sugar beets, squash, and zucchini, the majority
of which are engineered to tolerate herbicides and/or resist pests. While
about 54 percent of canola and more than 50 percent of papayas grown in
the U.S. were genetically modified in 2001 and 2002, respectively, farmers
have yet to widely adopt any of the other commercially available GM
crops.
GM corn, canola and soy are the ingredients most commonly used in our
food supply in the form of processed foods. But because labeling is not
required for such ingredients in the U.S., this remains a little known
fact. Indeed, more than 60 percent of processed foods on the average
grocery store shelf now contain GM ingredients. With the exception of
canola and papaya, other GM crops approved for commercial use do not
appear to be available for purchase yet, though this could of course
change at any time.
Currently, no form of GM meat has been approved for human consumption,
but engineered fish are under active consideration in the U.S.
Grassroots Resistance Pays Off
In spite of increasing opposition from the biotechnology industry, in
the last year citizens in California, Vermont and Hawaii effectively
joined together to address the issue of genetically modified organisms
(GMOs) in their communities.
As a result of their efforts, three California counties and one town
successfully banned GM crops and animals: Mendocino, Trinity and Marin
counties and the town of Arcata. Be on the lookout for several more bans
here in the year ahead.
In Vermont, 79 towns passed resolutions against GMOs, which laid the
groundwork for the state to pass a seed labeling bill. Additionally,
progress has also been made on a state bill that would hold biotech
corporations liable for unintended contamination of conventional or
organic crops by GM plant materials.
Hawaii — with the
highest concentration of experimental testing of GMOs in the country, and
home to GM papaya trees — has also been developing effective anti-GMO strategies, and
successfully banned a resolution against GM coffee in 2004.
Getting Involved
Consumer awareness and participation grows increasingly important as GM
products rapidly enter the marketplace on a large scale, despite limited
field research and safety testing. Being such a new application of
biotechnology, the risks and benefits of the majority of GM products are
still largely unknown and untested. If we don’t speak up, we leave the decision of gauging
this technology to industry and the federal government, which arguably
don’t always represent
our best interests.
One option we have to is to look to the model used in California to ban
GMOs:
1. People write a proposed law (e.g., saying that it will be illegal to
grow or plant GMOs).
2. Thousands of signatures then need to be gathered (about 10% of the
number of voters in the county) to show that there is enough support to
put this initiative to the vote.
3. Residents of the county then have the opportunity to vote on whether
or not to support this initiative and enact it as a county law. (The vote
usually happens the next time voters in the county go to the polls for a
local, state or national election.)
At the end of the day, companies will not sell what we don’t buy. So for those opposed to
GMOs, one can at least exercise diligence in buying habits and buy local
and organic whenever possible.
References
PEW Initiative on Food & Biotechnology. 2004. "Genetically Modified Crops in the
United States"
(August). Online at
pewagbiotech.org/resources/factsheets.
Jeffrey M. Smith. 2005. "U.S. Government & Biotech Industry Playing Genetic
Roulette" (January).
Online at www.organicconsumers.org/ge.
Carol Ness. 2004. "Fighting for the future of food: Deborah Koons Garcia’s film documents how genetically
engineered foods slipped into our supply." San Francisco Chronicle (November
7).
Union of Concerned Scientists. 2003. "Biotechnology" (January). Online at www.ucsusa.org/food_and_environment/biotechnology.
" Luke Anderson’s Overview
of Anti-GE Activism in the USA in 2004." 2005. GM
Watch Daily (January 10). Online at www.gmwatch.org.
Back to index
|