So it looks like all of us
(90% of us, anyway) are going to get a tax rebate, to “stimulate” the
lagging
economy. What should we/you do with it? The quick and easy answer:
Spend it at
the Co-op, of course!
But let’s look at this rebate
idea in a little more depth and think about it a little. Not all
spending has
the same impact on economic activity. A long time ago, the British
economist
Keynes recognized that a dollar can have different “multiplier” effects
when spent.
If it goes to corporations who take their profits and run, or goes to
increase
foreign production, or becomes income to wealthy people who may just
save it
rather than re-spend it, it may have little
local impact. Conversely, if
the dollar goes to a local business that employs local people who in
turn spend
their incomes locally, it may have an economic stimulus far beyond its
initial
amount.
Not all spending is equal.
In fact, a flat-out tax
rebate is just about the least effective way the national government
could
stimulate the economy. Roughly 40% of all goods and services purchased
in the
U.S.A. are imported. State and sales taxes will take another chunk.
(The
rebates will not be considered as income and taxed federally, as
happened in
2001.) So if people go out and spend their rebates on things produced
abroad
and sold nationally by corporations, they will be stimulating the
profit
margins of these corporations. The local impact, on jobs or income,
will be
minimal — some increase in low-paid clerical jobs at the local malls,
maybe —
and what happens to these jobs when the stimulus is all spent? There
are a
dozen different ways this amount of federal expenditure would be better
used,
but this is not the time or place to make a case for them. However, one
quick
example would be construction jobs to fix New York’s deteriorating
bridges and
roads. What comes to mind right away is the billboard on Interstate 787
that I
see frequently, which reminds us how dangerous our bridges are.
But the legislation has been
passed and soon we’ll be getting the checks. To some Co-op members they
will be
a welcome addition to very tight budgets. I would encourage you to
spend the
money, even within a tight budget that has little discretionary room,
in ways
that build the local economy. Perhaps some needed home repair (the
repair
company will in turn likely spend their income locally). Perhaps on
education
and training — the more skilled the local work force, the better off
we’ll all
be. Perhaps buying from local farmers, or a CSA share, or a local
business.
And, yes, spend as much as you are able to at the Co-op, on local
products if
you can, and not on the fancy imports.
Or
perhaps your budget is not as tight and you can exercise some choice.
Remember
that HWFC will soon be coming to the members and shareholders and
asking them
to invest in a new store. Five thousand shareholders times $600 each is
three
million bucks, almost a third of the total amount we need to borrow.
Think
about it, and if you can, set it aside until we ask you for a loan.
Loaning to
ourselves may be the most “stimulating” (in all the senses of the word)
thing
we could do with the money