Coop Scoop Navigation Bar

Coop Scoop

Meat, Poultry and Fish at the Coop?

from the Collective Management Team

By the year 2003, it was becoming increasingly clear that we as a coop needed to start planning for the future. Already, at that time, our sales per square foot were far greater than that of the average food coop. We had the same amount of space in several departments that we had since we moved here, even though our sales had more than doubled. Although we had two options for extensions, we were contemplating being two years away from the end of our lease. That summer we hired Pete Davis, a consultant from Cooperative Development Services, to do a market survey for us. We also did a survey ourselves, in an attempt to find out what our members and shoppers are looking for. Then, In September, the strategic planning retreat was held, out of which grew the Strategic Planning committee and all of its subcommittees. At the retreat, we talked about what our personal hopes for the Coop were; and we also talked about what made sense for the Coop, based on the surveys.

There were quite a few items that came out of the focus groups or the surveys that were rejected for lack of support, including the sale of alcohol. There were some things that did have more support, including the sale of meat. The survey showed us that working members favored the stocking of meat by a margin of greater than two to one, poultry by nearly three to one, and fish by an even greater margin. Non-working shareholders and non-member shoppers favored all of these by even greater margins. We decided that even though the bylaws do not prohibit Honest Weight from carrying these products, we would let the members decide by holding a referendum, as we didn’t want to break with what the Coop has traditionally done without having a discussion first.

Nearly two years later, the referenda still have not happened. One reason for this is simply that institutional attention has been diverted elsewhere, but another reason that it has been delayed is due to disagreement about the wording of the referendum.

Some members have made a case that the referenda language should specify explicit criteria that would restrict what animal products could be stocked at the Coop. Suggestions were made at the meeting in July to limit what we would stock to locally raised certified-organic minimally processed meat and fish. The management team of Honest Weight Coop is concerned that framing the referenda in this manner will inhibit us from providing our diverse membership with many of the products they want. We favor simple wordings for the referenda: “Should the Coop be allowed to stock fish?” “Should the Coop be allowed to stock poultry?” “Should the Coop be allowed to stock meat?” If we restrict ourselves to stocking only locally raised products, then we will not be able to carry certified-organic meats. While we have a great deal of confidence in both Misty Knoll and Sap Bush Hollow Farms, neither is certified organic, and we do have customers who are looking for meat and poultry with third-party organic certification.

If we restrict ourselves to selling only locally raised products, there are many products we will not be able to carry. For example, we would not be able to carry cold cuts, as there is no one locally who produces them. We are sure that many of our members would like to be able to purchase Applegate Farm cold cuts — and currently go elsewhere to buy them. There is also great demand for canned fish, canned broths, frozen entrées and similar products that are available through our national distributors. We don’t believe that we are significantly reducing the consumption of these products by not stocking them. Our own survey tells us that our members and other shoppers simply go elsewhere to get these products. Furthermore, consumer research indicates that these customers are likely to purchase other items that we do carry, meaning that we are effectively encouraging our members to shop at our competitors, such as Hannaford and Price Chopper. We’d prefer that they use their dollars to support a local, cooperatively owned business — the Honest Weight Food Coop.

We’d also like to be able to support Organic Prairie, the organic beef, pork and poultry-producing arm of Organic Valley — and a farmer’s coop. Limiting us to purchase from local sources prevents us from supporting other coops, something specifically called for in the Cooperative Principles.

 While we’re committed to supporting our local farmers — Misty Knoll, Sap Bush, and whoever else may arise — we’re also concerned that we will outstrip the local supply if we limit ourselves to stocking meat from local sources. We believe that it would take years for our local farms to grow their flocks to a size that would satisfy all of our local demand. As things stand now, they regularly run out of specific items.

There is no locally raised fish available. We could write different standards for fish than for meat or poultry, but it’s not clear to us why non-local fish is OK but non-local meat or poultry is not. For us, this all comes down to how we can best satisfy member demand. We would apply the same principles of buying to meat products as we would to other grocery products. Coop members who are meat eaters are going to eat meat whether we stock it or not. We’d like to be able to offer them something that’s of higher quality than what they are likely to find at the conventional grocer, while at the same time encouraging them to support a local business — the Honest Weight Food Coop — in the process.

Back to index

CoopScoop Home
CoopScoop Archives
Behind the Scoop
Guidelines for Article

     Submission
 

Membership Information About the Coop Site Map Links Meetings and Events Sale Flyer Coop Home Page